Race as Property and Why the Alt-Right Exists

The Alt-Right is clearly a movement which has attracted attention from young people as of late. The reason why I believe it exists is for various reasons, but first and foremost is the concept of race, as a biological concept, as property. I do not see this as a bad thing, because race not only influences the inheritance of important evolutionary adaptations, such as intelligence and behavioral traits but also provides the necessary platform for the continued, directed evolution of a closely related group of people. Under the system of Propertarianism, race, as a form of property (I speak of property here as a norm, rather than some mystical characteristic of a thing) would most likely fall under the category of commons. Now this property, for Northwestern Europeans and their relatives in North America, is under threat from low birth rates and the mass immigration of racially different people. It is also under threat from miscegenation.

Race, I believe, has gained importance in the right due to the fact that for many people, it is the only long-lasting, tangible property which they effectively lay claim to, as opposed to something they are paying a rent, lease, or mortgage on. As post-industrial society has become extremely complex, and what property one has today may be very different from what one has tomorrow, the Alt-Right is effectively investing in a form of property which can survive stock market crashes, housing bubbles and more. Race can also survive vast changes in public religious opinion, though often one religion or another will be detrimental for its long-term survival.

So I think that even the members Alt-Right are to be considered sovereigns; they are, I believe, aristocrats under the system of Aristocratic Egalitarianism because they have mutually agreed to protect each other’s property, their race, from outside threats.



The ethnocentric portion of the neoreaction seems to have taken two different strategies comparable to the means of warfare represented by the two Indo-European sovereignty deities, known from the Vedas as Mitra and Varuna, Germanic myth as Tiwaz and Wodanaz, and Roman religion as Dius Fidius and Iuppiter (Jupiter). Whereas Mitra represents the priest, jurist, and lawyer, Varuna represents a vengeful magician king, as do his counterparts Woden, and Jupiter. This distinction is explained fully in Georges Dumezil’s work Mitra-Varuna, but it can also be observed by the casual scholar of the Indic Vedas, Norse Eddas, and the ancient Roman religion. If you are unfamiliar with this theory, you can view Dumezil’s book here.

Woden/Odin, the Germanic Varuna

The nature of the Alt-Right is, and has been, a fundamentally Wodenic, or Varunian one. It is often focused on a sort of racial mysticism, combined often with an independent, Nietzschean type of irreligion and an ecstatic frenzy for warfare. It has also attracted outcasts from every corner of society under the hegemony of political correctness, which reminds one of Odin’s role as a patron of outcasts (you can read about his various attributes here). On the other hand, Propertarians represent a type of neoreaction more akin to the characters of Mitra, Dius Fidius or Tiwaz. Unlike the Varunian Alt-Right, Propertarians seek to take advantage of the concept of justice, contracts, courts, and the law to get their way, only using violence when these methods fail to produce desired outcomes. Ultimately, each approach applies itself to different circumstances, and both will likely be necessary for the neoreaction to have its intended effects.

The following videos highlight some quotes of Nietzsche and Schopenhauer. I think there is a fundamentally Wodenic, or Varunian spirit in both of their philosophies, but particularly in the highly individualistic viewpoint Nietzsche.

-Update 1/3/2017-

The Mitra-Varuna dichotomy I describe above seems to mesh fairly well with the Nietzschean concepts of the Apollonian (corresponding to Mitra) and the Dionysian (corresponding to Varuna). Nietzsche, of course is very Dionysian; he is a reaction against the excessive Apollonianism which began with the Protestant Reformation and continued with Whig politics, and the Enlightenment values which still pervade to this day.





Towards an Ethnic European Group Evolutionary Strategy

If anyone reading this article has heard of Dr.Kevin MacDonald and knows the summary of his notable works The Culture of Critique, and Separation and its Discontents, Toward an Evolutionary Theory of Anti-Semitism, one understands the importance of a group evolutionary strategy in the survival and well-being of a people. MacDonald argues that Christianity acted as a group evolutionary strategy against Judaism (also a group evolutionary strategy), and a read through the New Testament would seem to confirm this.

To me, it is obvious that the Christianity in its modern form (since the Nominalist revolution in philosophy) has encouraged ethnic Europeans to be less ethnocentric, and is thus no longer a suitable group evolutionary strategy for ethnic Europeans. A replacement is needed, and many have responded to this need with the idea that it is necessary to revive pre-Christian polytheistic religions. I agree that it would be romantic to revive Asatru, Nova Roma, Hellenismos, Neo-Druidism, Romuva etc. as ethnic religions.  However, the reality of the situation is that many if not most Asatruars, and many other neopagans are hostile against European ethnocentric behavior. So it is also obvious to me that European polytheism does not effectively encourage ethnocentrism among ethnic Europeans, and is therefore not the solution we need. From this I have gathered that religion cannot be our sole, or even primary, group evolutionary strategy; we instead need something deeper which crosses all the religious barriers between different factions of the Alt-Right and Neoreaction.

What we need most of all is to pass down narratives. Narratives are powerful. One could argue that the entire Jewish group evolutionary strategy is centered around narrative, the Old Testament. As ethnic Europeans, we have a wealth of narratives to pass down to our children, students, pupils etc: Leonidas at Thermopylae, Arminius and the Battle of the Teutoberg forest, the story of Mucius Scaevola, and the Aeneid to name a few. All of which contain stories of men who bravely stood in the face of massive opposition just as we do today because they understood their duty their people, their ancestors, their children, and their nation.

Image result for aeneas

Additionally , there is an important meta-narrative, which appears to draw from many of the ones I have previously listed–the works Tolkien. Tolkien presented ethnic Europeans under the guise of hobbits, men and elves, all of whom would have their homelands attacked and people destroyed by orcs and servants of Melkor had it not been for their cooperative efforts both on the battlefield, and in destroying the One Ring. In Tolkien’s narratives one finds both the admonitions against cowardice, and the moral instruction which are needed for the formation of a group evolutionary strategy.

DON’T be a Denethor

Image result for denethor flee

Rather, follow the example of Galadriel:

In the following video, she has no sympathy for her enemies; notice her words: “If you try to stop me, I will destroy you”. Also notice the cryptic language of Sauron: “You cannot fight the shadow. Even now you fade. One light alone in the darkness”. It sounds a lot like what the globalist cosmopolitans say to intimidate us: “You cannot keep your country white, we will wipe you out of existence, you are just a bunch of losers etc”. Yet as Galadriel says, and something we should all remind ourselves “I am not alone”.

More of the same from Sauron in the next video too: “The time of the Elves is over. The Age of the Orc has come”. Compare to: “The time of the European is over, the age of rapugees and ISIL has come”. Yet Galadriel is courageous, and eventually, she expels Sauron from Dol Goldur.

These narratives are what we need to be teaching our kids. From them, we can develop a full blown counter-narrative which will compete directly against the Europhobic, Cultural Marxist narrative of leftist academics, public education, and the mainstream media.

Why Nietzsche? How I See Things

Wanderer above the Sea of Fog, Caspar David Fredrich

Those of you who are more familiar with the German philosopher Fredrich Nietzsche may be wondering why an ethnonationalist like myself is blogging about him. It seems common knowledge that Nietzsche was against nationalism, so why do I bother to bring him up?

Update 2/19/2017 I wrote this a while back and may disagree with it to a certain extent.

Continue reading “Why Nietzsche? How I See Things”

Errors of the Alt-Right and their Precursors

After having watched a video of Richard Spencer’s presentation “Why Do They Hate Us”, and having read the comments below the video, it became clear to me that much of the general population is incapable of trusting the Alt-Right, including organizations such as the NPI (National Policy Institute) and American Renaissance, to be separatist or nationalist, as opposed to supremacist. Perhaps it is something about the image of a bunch of middle-aged to elderly white men in suits that gives them the creeps. I don’t know. For all practical purposes, those who think that the White Nationalism is covertly supremacist are really conspiracy theorists. They are very ignorant about the movement, and simply classify any movement that gives European-Americans a positive ethnic identity as “supremacist”.

A few comments were very interesting, and showed the diversity, and depth of thought found throughout the general public towards European-American Ethnonationalism. If you want to see the full gamut of public reaction you should follow this link.ImportanteVery ImportantHousesI perceive that the real issue here is that many in the general public are simply scared. they are reacting out of fear instead of empathy and reason. Either that, or they are closet communists… who knows? The job of Ethnonationalists now is to help the general public understand us rationally, thus we must clearly articulate what we are aiming for and what we are not aiming for. Aiming to make America a country with demographics similar to that of the mid-20th century scares a lot of people because it reminds them of the civil rights infringements during that time period. Therefore, a great error which the Alt-Right has commited is the conflation of ethnic nationalism with American civic Nationalism, which is largely (in my opinion) due to the (possibly unintentional) muddying of the waters by US presidential candidate Donald Trump and his Alt-Right supporters.


Once European-American Ethnonationalists clearly articulate their goal of political separatism within a limited geographic area, critics will have two options: 1.) Paranoia, or 2.) Rational Discourse. Those who remain paranoid that this is somehow a supremacist movement will have a burden of proof to back up their position. The other option, rational discourse, entails taking an objective look at the Alt-Right, as Sargon of Akkad has done in making this video. I don’t think that the Alt-Right is objectively bad, as Sargon seems to by the end of his video, but it does need a great deal of reform in order to gain mass appeal and actually work as a political platform.

As a Tolkien fan I can compare this crisis regarding the Alt-Right to a situation in the Battle of the Last Alliance. The Sindar Elvenking Oropher, who, with his son Thranduil, leads an army of Silvan elves against Sauron, charges hastily into battle without the command of the Noldor (a very wise clan of elves), and is subsequently killed. Richard Spencer (like many others before him in the White Nationalist movement) has charged into the current demographic culture war hastily without clearly stating his ultimate goal and without sufficiently confronting the intellectual arguments of the egalitarian left, subsequently to receive backlash from much of the general public through the label “white supremacist”.

Oropher’s Body

Now we, as young Millennial Ethnonatinoaists, Alt-Righters, and Neoreactionaries, like Thranduil end up returning from the battle, our courageous forbears put to shame, barely escaping with our (not life, but rather) reputation intact.We must learn from the mistakes of the efforts of our elders in our movement. We must use tact, we must carefully strategize, we must use precision to fight the great ideological Sauron of our time, Cultural Marxism. We must do so, not only for ourselves, but for subsequent generations of European-Americans.

Thranduil reunites with his son Legolas after the Battle of the Last Alliance